Inter-service Relations - 5

DAWODU.COM 

Dedicated to Nigeria's socio-political issues

 

2009 US DIVERSITY VISA LOTTERY INFORMATION

 

October 3, 2007 - December 2, 2007

 

 

LUNARPAGES.COM and IPOWERWEB.COM - Despicable WebHosts - Read My Story

 

 

 

 

Inter-service Relations: Imperatives for Jointness (Part 5)

continued from: http://www.dawodu.com/omoigui69.htm

 

By

 

Nowa A. Omoigui

nowa_o@yahoo.com

 

 

Being a lecture delivered at the National War College, Nigeria

 

Friday, January 27, 2006

 

 

 

THE NOTION OF INTER-DEPENDABILITY OF SECURITY AGENCIES

 

Let me introduce the concept of Inter-dependability of Security services and roles.

 

The division of domestic responsibility between the Military and Police, as two components (among others) of a State Security Tool Box, should, in my view, be contextualized holistically in terms of the broad spectrum of Human and National Security.  The reason for this is that there is a continuum of overlapping roles and responsibilities and codependence from domestic to external arenas. 

 

Recent experience has taught us that transnational problems can manifest domestically while apparently domestic issues can spill over borders.  It is also important to factor in the extension of the security arena into ill-geographically defined areas such as computer networks and the emergence of asymmetric threats (low intensity warfare) as the dominant paradigm for current and future Military operations other than war. 

 

Functionally, it makes sense that some of the domestic security responsibilities should be primary, based on core competence and capability to function as the first responder and lead agency.  Other responsibilities should be secondary, based on the need to provide depth to other agencies that are better oriented, equipped and maintained to be first responders to such matters in support of National Security.  (See Table below)

 

TABLE OF POTENTIAL DOMESTIC MILITARY AND POLICE ROLES AND RESPONSIBILITIES

 

(Adapted from a presentation by Dr. Nowa Omoigui on “Civilian views of civil-Military relations in democratizing states” at the “Next Generation of African Military Leaders Program”, on January 24, 2006 - National Defense University, Washington DC.)

 

Responsibility

Military role

Police role

Role of other government departments

Prepare to fight and win wars, defend against foreign aggression and/or violation of air, land and sea borders

Primary

Secondary

Secondary

Prevention and investigation of civil crimes

None (unless requested for support on a case-by-case basis)

Primary

Secondary

Small scale emergency services

None (unless requested for support on a case-by-case basis)

Primary

Co-primary (Fire service, hospitals)

Assurance of State control of the machinery of government

Secondary (could be primary in major insurrections, strikes, etc.)

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Environmental security

Secondary

Secondary

Primary

Information security

Secondary

Secondary

Primary

Financial security (Counter-money laundering)

None

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary (could be primary)

Domestic Intelligence

Secondary

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary (could be primary)

Counter-intelligence

Secondary

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary (could be primary)

Immigration and Customs control

None (However, Naval units have sometimes been tasked to assist)

Secondary (may be primary in some countries)

Primary (Customs)

Counter-Smuggling

Secondary (e.g. maritime interception)

Secondary (could be primary)

Primary

Counter-Inland waterway Piracy

Secondary (could be primary)

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Counter-Proliferation of small arms

Secondary (could be primary)

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Counter-Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Secondary (could be primary)

Anti-Terrorism

Secondary (could be primary)

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Counter-Terrorism

Secondary (could be primary)

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Drug enforcement (Counter-Drug operations)

Secondary

Secondary

Primary (Drug Enforcement Agencies)

Critical Infrastructure Security/Key Asset protection

Secondary (could be primary)

Secondary (could be primary)

Secondary (could be primary)

Public Health security

Secondary (extreme cases)

Secondary (extreme cases)

Primary

Complex Disaster Search and Rescue; Evacuation and resettlement; Famine relief

Primary (could be secondary)

Secondary

Secondary (could be primary if dedicated)

Civic works (roads, bridges, dams, irrigation projects etc.)

Secondary

None

Primary

Space exploration

Secondary (could be primary)

None

Primary (could be secondary)

 

What this table shows is that the Military and the Police are only two among many inter-dependable partners for National Security. 

 

 

APPLYING INSIGHTS GAINED TO CONTEMPORARY NIGERIAN PROBLEMS

 

As we have seen, joint operations are not a new idea in Military history.   Nevertheless, the two primary reasons for contemporary “Military jointness” are as follows:

 

bullet

It enhances optimal matching of commitments, resources and capabilities, as the Armed Forces develops the ability to function seamlessly and in a timely manner within an integrated battle space that includes not only sub-surface, surface, near-surface, air and space environments, but also cyberspace. To attain this, joint vision, joint tactics, joint doctrine, joint staff procedures, joint budgeting and joint training must be developed and implemented.

bullet

Based on the foregoing, jointness helps to win wars and ensure success of selected “military operations other than war” by allowing the Joint Commander to exercise any permutation and/or combination of choices in his tool box dictated by circumstances.

 

Similarly, the two primary reasons to minimize rivalry and enhance cooperation between the Military and Police are:

 

bullet

It saves resources, by allowing optimal matching of domestic commitments, resources and capabilities.

bullet

It enhances individual, public and state security by ensuring security inter-dependability.

 

Thus, from the standpoint of Military jointness, Nigeria should:

 

bullet

Facilitate Joint Vision, Joint Values and Joint Ethics across the Military services for Defence

 

bullet

Reinvigorate individual service professionalism to enhance the quality of force generation.

 

bullet

Consider separate career tracks for future service chiefs; one which leads to appointment of individual service chiefs on the basis of certain “individual service” criteria and the other for future Chiefs of Defence Staff, based on aptitude for and experience in “joint” appointments.  The system of rotation among the three services should be continued. The structure of the British Ministry of Defence and Joint HQ deserves further study to determine applicability to Nigeria.   

 

bullet

Streamline membership of the National Defence and Security Councils to enhance jointness.  This may require constitutional amendment.

 

bullet

Establish Joint doctrines

 

bullet

Negotiate a Joint concept of operations

 

bullet

Adopt strategic capability planning as the basis for Force development

 

bullet

Revisit the concept of unified commands and formalize the chain of command for operations to tighten any loopholes.

 

bullet

Minimize the number of types of officer commissions to enhance officer cohesion

 

bullet

Consolidate Joint Staff, Joint Intelligence, Joint Logistics, Joint Training, Joint Operations, Joint Procurement and Joint Personnel planning

 

bullet

Develop Joint Command, Control, Communications, Computers, Intelligence, Surveillance, and Reconnaissance (C4ISR) Tactics

 

bullet

Upgrade Force generation measures and development of ethos at Service levels

 

bullet

Apply conditions of service in a consistent manner across the services.

 

bullet

Consolidate and minimize the number of entry depots for non-commissioned officers and other ranks

 

From the standpoint of Military-Police cooperation, Nigeria should:

 

bullet

Facilitate a Joint Vision, Joint Values and Joint Ethics across the Security services (including the Military and Police) for a variety of Security roles (See Table of domestic roles).   This will enable the introduction of super ordinate goals of high appeal value for both soldiers and Policemen whose attainment is beyond the resources and efforts of either group alone.

 

bullet

Ensure that the Military and Police leadership understands that there is no such thing as a bad soldier or bad Policeman; only bad Military and Police officers.  It is the responsibility of the leadership to show good example to servicemen at lower rungs in the system and enforce professional values and ethics.  The notion that all is well between senior Military and Police officers, while their men shoot each other to death, is an unfortunate admission of command failure. 

 

bullet

Consider establishing a Joint National Security Academy, where various courses that cut across the entire field of Human Security can be offered to service personnel at low, intermediate and senior levels drawn from Military, Police and other security agencies, as well as the public.  In the alternative, offer such training at Military and Police institutions to which service personnel from any service can subscribe or be sent.  This will support other efforts to nurture corporate esprit de corps at the supra-service level of "National Defence and Security."

 

bullet

Exploit the opportunity presented by the threat of contemporary asymmetric, space, and cyber-space warfare to create new non-traditional joint Force Structures.  This could include establishing a Constabulary (or National Guard) to which soldiers and Policemen may be deployed (after re-training) on rotation for duties that fall in between traditional Military and Police roles.  During these rotations the Constabulary will enable soldiers and Policemen to co-exist, guided by joint etiquette, customs, ceremonies, and traditions.  

 

bullet

Consolidate and minimize the number of entry depots for non-commissioned officers and other ranks.  

 

bullet

Increase the number of opportunities for the Military to attend educational programs at Police institutions particularly for operations other than war. 

 

bullet

Upgrade physical, moral and academic requirements for entry into the Police.  Although Police training should be specialized and adapted to Police tasks, Military personnel should not be allowed to acquire the perception that the Police accept recruits of lower physical, moral and academic stature. 

 

bullet

Formalize internal processes in the military for ensuring that its personnel maintain up-to-date driving (and riding) licenses and insurance documents.

 

bullet

Vigorously expand Joint Training (including Joint NCO training) for Internal Security duties.

 

bullet

Reinvigorate Police professionalism and assist the Police in its need for rebirth to enhance its public image.  It cannot seriously expect to be better respected by the Military if society as a whole has a poor image of it. 

 

bullet

Create mechanisms to allow Military and Police service personnel discuss Police-Military relations at open fora. 

 

bullet

Develop standard guidelines for investigating and responding to inter-service clashes, including creating opportunities not just for disciplining erring servicemen and women but also for psychological counseling of the units involved.

 

bullet

Monitor joint Military and Police social events to ensure that opportunities for socialization are actually being exploited.  Inter-personal suspicions dating back to the days of Military rule have kept many officers and other ranks away from mess life.  Those social events that enhance inter-dependability should be encouraged.

 

bullet

Revive the office of Military-Police Liaison officers at the Police and Defence Headquarters.  Liaison officers, preferably drawn from the Military Police, also need to be established at state and local levels.  These liaison officers should establish joint mechanisms for resolving misunderstandings before they get out of hand.  

 

bullet

Avoid accepting applicants into the Police who have been rejected by the Military for any reason.

 

bullet

Deliberately teach Inter-service rivalry and cooperation at Military, Police and other Security Academies.

 

bullet

Consider co-location of Military and Police Barracks in future Force planning estimates. This will allow sharing of certain amenities like schools for children of service persons.

 

bullet

Vigorously address welfare issues and corruption in the Security sector as a whole.  There isn’t likely to be much progress if money budgeted for security ends up in personal bank accounts while under-trained and under-equipped poverty stricken servicemen and women are abandoned on the streets to fend for themselves.

 

 

Concluded

 

 

RETURN TO HOME PAGE

horizontal rule

© 1999 - 2006 Segun Toyin Dawodu. All rights reserved. All unauthorized copying or adaptation of any content of this site will be liable to  legal recourse.

Contact:   webmaster@dawodu.com

Segun Toyin Dawodu, P. O. BOX 710080, HERNDON, VA  20171-0080, USA.

This page was last updated on 10/27/07.