Dedicated to Nigeria's socio-political issues
October 3, 2007 - December 2, 2007
Regionalism: Tales From The Good Old Days
culled from GUARDIAN, March 14, 2005
Beginning tomorrow, the National Conference on Political Reforms should go beyond the preliminaries, to confront the fundamentals. Going by the presentations by individuals and groups, the present system of government has failed to make Nigeria what the founding leaders expected of it.
Speaker after speaker, the delegates have lamented the stagnation of the national economy and the cost of this on the people. Chief Emeka Anyaoku, former Commonwealth Secretary-General, reminded Nigerians of how far behind the country is from development and growth. All the countries, which attained political independence together with Nigeria, are now major players in global economy.
Nigeria does not produce, yet it cannot even translate its huge oil earnings into a better life for the people. Roads are poorly maintained; new ones are difficult to come by. The energy situation is deplorable. To make matters worse, security of life and property is at the benevolence of men in power and the criminally minded in the society. The country is bogged down by ethnic and religious sentiments, which, time without number, had cost the nation in human and material resources.
Devolution of power
In reaching that conclusion, a critical review of the presidential system had been done. It was discovered that Nigeria's version of federalism is a central system whereby the federating units surrender nearly all authority to the federal. The lifeline is at the centre, to which the states and councils are plugged. It was discovered that the system is run at a very huge cost. Substantial part of the resources goes into oiling the machinery of state - paying salaries and maintaining obsolete bureaucracy. It is also from this purse that leaders pilfer and loot. Very little is left for growth and development.
It was ascertained, too, that the federal system has become the major source of political acrimony in the country. The regions and units have abandoned self-help in search of "free" allocation at the centre. The states have lost the initiative for economic enterprise and development. This has created a system of inequity and economic injustices, because those who fold their arms are the ones eating the most.
It was the military that fully exploited the situation. Immediately the First Republic collapsed, the regions were collapsed into a federal structure. States were created (not that they evolved of their own as units) to make governance through command control easy. All the regional economies were displaced and a bogus federal purse emerged.
Over the years, it has become a profitable venture for Nigerians to abandon their states to access the federal. It became keen competition among soldiers to scheme for control of federal power and its resources. The North, since the second coup of the July 1966, has gained the upper hand in Nigeria's Armed Forces. The result is that, from the initial 12 states in 1966, there are now 36 states whose creation is the arbitrary handiwork of the military.
The implication of this sub-division of the country into states and local governments is the major source of economic injustice and inequity in the distribution of resources. The allocation of resources is shared among the three tiers of government. This being the case, every new council or state that is created automatically joins in the sharing. To put their favoured ethnic groups and clans on the sharing formula, the military and the political class seriously exploited the exact method.
Lopsided creation of councils
When such arithmetic no longer made political sense, Lagos, like some other states, decided to create additional councils, to even up. That has been the source of acrimony between Lagos State and the Federal Government.
Another sad case is that of Akoko-Edo local council in Edo State. The council was created as a division in the former Mid West in 1963. Today, while other divisions have been balkanised into three or more councils, Akoko-Edo has remained the way it was in 1963. Except that during one of the military regimes, the people of Imeri, who were once in Edo State, left Akoko-Edo to join their kith and kin in Ondo State. It was Chief Bode Olajumoke, who made a case for his people and he got the listening ears of the then Armed Forces Ruling Council (AFRC).
In other words, any community that is unable to access the authorities should not expect justice. So many ethnic groups and communities have found themselves in this situation of neglect and impoverishment.
Having controlled the resources of Nigeria for a considerable period of time, the military found it difficult to relinquish power. Apart from the military, it became a thug of war for other sections to have access. The North became synonymous with power. The climax was the June 12, 1993 presidential election, which Chief MKO Abiola was set to win. That election was scuttled. It grieved the Southwest, to the extent that it provided opportunity for a re-think of the Nigerian project.
Properly managed economic power
The social sector was not spared. Education was neglected and the infrastructure began to decay. Brain-drain became an option for academics, who did not want to decay. Hospitals became consulting clinics and Nigerians began to die of preventable diseases.
Those Nigerians, who witnessed regional governments in the early sixties and during the colonial government, began to reminisce those good old days when people who had focus ran the regions. The regions were self-sustaining, basically dependent on agricultural economy. They developed blueprints for socio-economic growth. Primary education was free and compulsory for some. Higher education was subsidised. The health system was functional and the infrastructure for growth was in place. Indeed, growth was steady. Nigerians were, therefore, forced to make comparison between the good old days and what has become a steady decline into disintegration.
The position of Ndigbo at the 1995 Constitutional Conference was that Nigeria should evolve six geopolitical zones, which should be the federating units; and that a presidency with only one term of four years with six vice-presidents to reflect the zones be agreed upon.
This position reflects the anxiety, which the zone has lived with over the years - an overbearing centre and a system that makes it difficult for a president of Igbo extraction to emerge.
The Southeast may not be too comfortable with a return to regionalism. A federation in which the Igboman can rise to the highest office and be free to do business anywhere without let or hindrance would have been preferable.
Until the 13 per cent derivation, which is an attempt to assuage feelings of abandonment, the South-South has developed an attitude to take over its resources. Regionalism will allow the South-South to control at least 50 per cent of its earning from crude sales. That will distort the present fiscal allocation formula and some states will not like this.
There are questions to raise here. The 19 governors of the North called a Unity Conference last year to show solidarity with one another. At that time, the North was not heterogeneous. Even in the First Republic, the North ran a regional government and it survived. How come regionalism has now become an anathema?
Over-dependence on centre allocation
Regionalism will, therefore, be a hot debate as the weeks go by. But the challenge for the delegates is to grab the bull by the horns, and discuss fundamental restructuring of the polity. There is no better time than now.
© 1999 - 2006 Segun Toyin Dawodu. All rights reserved. All unauthorized copying or adaptation of any content of this site will be liable to legal recourse.
Segun Toyin Dawodu, P. O. BOX 710080, HERNDON, VA 20171-0080, USA.
This page was last updated on 10/27/07.